Essay: Disadvantages of Positive Liberty
With positive liberty, Pluralism does not seem as ideal, humane and truer as it is with negative liberty. It is not truer in positive liberty because it does not recognize that the goals of human beings are many and that some of the goals are in continuous rivalry with each another and also are commensurable. Positive liberty assumes that it is possible to grade all values in a scale such that it is possible to pick on the highest but this is just fiction. Since the assumptions of this type of liberty are impossible to achieve, it follows that its benefits are not achievable.
With positive liberty, more so when people feel that it is being misused, the citizens feel like they are just objects rather than subjects in the society and this affects their overall performance. One feels less useful to his society since he is not able to make a decision on his own but has to wait to be decided upon. This kind of ruling makes people feel like slaves and this is increased when the leaders appointed abuse the liberty. It follows that one cannot do so many things unless directed to do so. This is colonization to some extent despite the fact that it is being termed as freedom.