Essay: Biases of the system of policymaking
The recently concluded climate conference in Copenhagen Denmark exposed some great weaknesses in the US foreign policy on climate change. The US has robust domestic climate change policies that aim at reducing green house gas emissions into its atmosphere. However, very little has been achieved in trying to engage with other countries to reduce pollution and control global warming. The county understands very well that domestic policies are not enough to deal with the menace yet less admirable steps have been made at the global level to achieve this (Christopher and Charles, 2010, p. 116). This again put the country’s foreign policies under scrutiny by other countries like the UK and China who have agreed to sign the Kyoto protocol on greenhouse gas emissions. This protocol aims at compelling all nations including leading emitters of greenhouse gases under an obligation to control their effluence. The US on the other hand has remained numb about the issue and has refused to sign the agreement yet it accounts for 15 % of global green house emissions (Bolton, 2008, p. 105).
Going back to the real intentions of a country’s foreign policies in enhancing cooperation with other countries, the US policies on climate change can be said to be self-centered the reason being the country has aggressive approach to the problem at home but reluctant at the international platform. According to Christopher and Charles (2010, p. 125), it was good if the nation agreed that the overall change in climate will affect every body including the US itself and thus should cooperate with other countries in facing off the problem. Analyzing such differences at a global perspective reveal that foreign US policies on climate change are detrimental to the world and the US itself thus they are ineffective.